Heterogeneous welfare effects of farmer groups in smallholder irrigation schemes in South Africa

References

  • Abebaw D & Haile MG, 2013. The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Food Policy 38: 82–91.
  • Bachke ME, 2019. Do farmers’ organizations enhance the welfare of smallholders? Findings from the Mozambican national agricultural survey. Food Policy 89: Art. 101792.
  • Baker JL, 2000. Evaluating the impact of development projects on poverty: A handbook for practitioners. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  • Barham J & Chitemi C, 2009. Collective action initiatives to improve marketing performance: Lessons from farmer groups in Tanzania. Food Policy 34(1): 53–9.
  • Becker SO & Ichino A, 2002. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal 2(4): 358–77.
  • Blundell R & Costa Dias M, 2000. Evaluation methods for non-experimental data. Fiscal Studies 21(4): 427–68.
  • Caliendo M & Kopeinig S, 2008. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys 22(1): 31–72.
  • Cele L & Wale E, 2018. The role of land- and water-use rights in smallholders’ productive use of irrigation water in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 13(4): 345–356.
  • Chitsa G, 2014. Analysis of entrepreneurial behaviour of smallholder irrigation farmers: Empirical evidence from Qamata irrigation scheme. Doctoral dissertation, University of Fort Hare, South Africa.
  • Cobb-Clark DA & Crossley T, 2003. Econometrics for evaluations: An introduction to recent developments. The Economic Record 79 (247): 491–511.
  • Cousins B, 2013. Smallholder irrigation schemes, agrarian reform and ‘accumulation from above and from below’ in South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change 13(1): 116–39.
  • Crawford EW, Jayne TS & Kelly VA, 2006. Alternative approaches for promoting fertilizer use in Africa. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 22, World Bank, Washington DC.
  • Nguyen C, 2006. An introduction to alternative methods in program impact evaluation. Mansholt Graduate School, Discussion Paper No 33, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF), 2012. A framework for the development of smallholder farmers through cooperatives development. Pretoria: DAFF.
  • Department of Economic Development (DED), 2010. The new growth path (NGP). Pretoria: DED.
  • Duflo E, Kremer M & Robinson J, 2011. Nudging farmers to use fertiliser: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. American Economic Review 101(6): 2350–90.
  • Fischer E & Qaim M, 2012. Linking smallholders to markets: Determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Development 40(6): 1255–68.
  • Gezahegn TW, Van Passel S, Berhanu T, D’Haese M & Maertens M, 2019. Big is efficient: Evidence from agricultural cooperatives in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics 50: 555–66.
  • Gujarati DN, 2009. Basic econometrics. New York NY: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Hussain I & Hanjra MA, 2004. Irrigation and poverty alleviation: Review of the empirical evidence. Irrigation and Drainage 53(1): 1–15.
  • Ma W & Abdulai A, 2016. Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from apple farmers in China. Food Policy 58(C): 94–102.
  • Markelova H, Meinzen-Dick R, Hellin J & Dohrn S, 2009. Collective action for smallholder market access. Food Policy 34(1): 1–7.
  • Mayoux L, 1999. Questioning virtuous spirals: Micro-finance and women’s empowerment in Africa. Journal of International Development 11(7): 957–84.
  • Morris M, Kelly VA, Kopicki RJ & Byerlee D, 2007. Fertilizer use in African agriculture: Lessons learned and good practice guidelines. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  • Muchara B, Ortmann G, Wale E & Mudhara M, 2014. Collective action and participation in irrigation water management: A case study of Mooi River Irrigation Scheme in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa. Water SA 40(4): 699–708.
  • Moody J & Paxton P, 2009. Building bridges: Linking social capital and social networks to improve theory and research. American Behavioral Scientist 52(11): 1491–1506.
  • Nilsson J, 2001. Organisational principles for co-operative firms. Scandinavian Journal of Management 17(3): 329–56.
  • Ouma EA & Abdulai A, 2009. Contributions of social capital theory in predicting collective action behavior among livestock keeping communities in Kenya. Paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, 16–22 August, Beijing, China.
  • Ostrom E & Ahn TK, 2003. A social science perspective on social capital: Social capital and collective action. Revista Mexicana de Sociologia, 65(1): 155–233.
  • Phakathi S & Wale E, 2018. Explaining variation in the economic value of irrigation water using psychological capital: A case study from Ndumo B and Makhathini, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Water SA 44(4): 664–73.
  • Phakathi S, Sinyolo S, Marire J & Fraser G, 2021. Farmer-led institutional innovations in managing smallholder irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape provinces, South Africa. Agricultural Water Management 248: Article 106780.
  • Rosenbaum PR, 2002. Observational studies. Second edition. New York NY: Springer.
  • Sebhatu KT, Gezahegn TW, Berhanu T, Maertens M, Van Passel S & D’Haese M, 2021. Exploring variability across cooperatives: Economic performance of agricultural cooperatives in northern Ethiopia. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 1–24.
  • Selejio O & Lasway JA, 2019. Economic analysis of the adoption of inorganic fertilisers and improved maize seeds in Tanzania. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 14(4): 310–330.
  • Sharaunga S & Mudhara M, 2016. Factors influencing water-use security among smallholder irrigating farmers in Msinga, KwaZulu-Natal province. Water Policy 18(5): 1209–28.
  • Shiferaw B, Obare G, Muricho G & Silim S, 2009. Leveraging institutions for collective action to improve markets for smallholder producers in less-favoured areas. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 3(1): 1–18.
  • Sinyolo S & Mudhara M, 2018a. Collective action and rural poverty reduction: Empirical evidence from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Agrekon 57(1): 78–90.
  • Sinyolo S & Mudhara M, 2018b. Farmer groups and inorganic fertiliser use among smallholders in rural South Africa. South African Journal of Science 114: 1–9.
  • Sinyolo S, Mudhara M & Wale E, 2014. Water security and rural household food security: Empirical evidence from the uMzinyathi district in South Africa. Food Security 6: 483–99.
  • Sinyolo SA, Sinyolo S, Mudhara M & Ndinda C, 2018. Gender differences in water access and household welfare among smallholder irrigators in Msinga local municipality, South Africa. Journal of International Women’s Studies 19(5): 129–46.
  • Van Averbeke W, Denison J & Mnkeni PNS, 2011. Smallholder irrigation schemes in South Africa: A review of knowledge generated by the Water Research Commission. Water SA 37(5): 797–808.
  • Verhofstadt E & Maertens M, 2015. Can agricultural cooperatives reduce poverty? Heterogeneous impact of cooperative membership on farmers’ welfare in Rwanda. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 37(1): 86–106.
  • Wossen T, Abdoulaye T, Alene A, Haile MG, Feleke S, Olanrewaju A & Manyong V, 2017. Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare. Journal of Rural Studies 54: 223–33.