Heterogeneity in consumer preferences for organic and genetically modified food products in Ghana

References

  • Al-Rabaani A & Al-Shuali A, 2014. Sultan Qaboos University students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding organic and genetically modified food products. International Journal of Social Science & Education 5(1): 28–37.
  • Birol E, Karousakis K & Koundouri P, 2006. Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecological Economics 60(1): 145–56.
  • Boccaletti S & Moro D, 2000. Consumer willingness-to-pay for GM food products in Italy. AgBioForum – The Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management and Economics 4:259–67.
  • Bonah E, Issah NG & Kunyangna P, 2017. Consumer knowledge, perceptions and acceptance of genetically modified foods among residents in the Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. American Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research 4(3): 87–98.
  • Boxall PC & Adamowicz WL, 2002. Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 23(4): 421–46.
  • Buah JN, 2011. Public perception of genetically modified food in Ghana. American Journal of Food Technology 6(7), 541–54.
  • Bukenya JO & Wright NR, 2007. Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified tomatoes. Agribusiness: An International Journal 23(1): 117–30.
  • Carlsson F, Frykblom P & Lagerkvist CJ, 2004. Consumer benefits of labels and bans on genetically modified food – An empirical analysis using choice experiments. Working Papers in Economics No. 129, Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg.
  • Costa-Font M & Gil JM, 2009. Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: A cross country study. Food Quality and Preference 20(6): 399–409.
  • Emberger-Klein A, Zapilko M & Menrad K, 2016. Consumers’ preference heterogeneity for GM and organic food products in Germany. Agribusiness 32(2): 203–21.
  • Fiebig DG, Keane MP, Louviere J & Wasi N, 2010. The generalized multinomial logit model: Accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Marketing Science 29: 393–421.
  • Ganiere P, Chern WS & Hahn D, 2006. A continuum of consumer attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(1): 129-149.
  • Gaskell G, Stares S, Allansdottir A, Allum N, Castro P, Esmer Y, Fischler C, Jackson J, Kronberger N, Hampel J & Mejlgaard N, 2010. Europeans and biotechnology in 2010. Winds of change? A report to the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Green G, Sunding D, Zilberman D & Parker D, 1997. Explaining irrigation technology choices: A microparameter approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(4): 1064–72.
  • Greene WH & Hensher DA, 2010. Does scale heterogeneity across individuals matter? An empirical assessment of alternative logit models. Transportation 37(3): 413–28.
  • Greene WH, Hensher DA & Rose J, 2006. Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40:75–92.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2010. Final document: International Scientific Symposium: Biodiversity and sustainable diets united against hunger, 3–5 November, FAO Headquarters, Rome. Available at http://www.fao.org/ag/humannutrition/29186-021e012ff2db1b0eb6f6228e1d98c806a.pdf (Accessed 25 November 2010).
  • Ganiere P & Chern WS, 2004. Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods: A profile of American consumers. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, 1–4 August, Denver CO.
  • Hensher DA, Greene WH & Rose JM, 2006. Deriving willingness-to-pay estimates of travel-time savings from individual-based parameters. Environment and Planning 38: 2365–76.
  • Kimenju SC & De Groote H, 2008. Consumers’ willingness to pay for genetically modified food in Kenya. Agricultural Economics 38: 35–46.
  • Huber M, Rembialkowska E, Srednicka D, Bügel S & Van de Vijver LPL, 2011. Organic food and impact on human health: Assessing the status quo and prospects of research. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 58(3–4): 103–9.
  • Kushwaha S, Musa AS, Lowenberg-DeBoert J & Fulton J, 2004. Consumer acceptance of GMO cowpeas in sub-Sahara Africa. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, 1–4 August, Denver CO.
  • Lancaster KJ, 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy 74(2):132–57.
  • Magnusson MK, Arvola A, Koivisto Hursti UK, Åberg L & Sjödén PO, 2001. Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers. British Food Journal 103(3): 209–27.
  • Manski CF, 1977. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 8(3): 229–54.
  • McFadden D, 1974. The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics 3(4):303–28.
  • Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA), 2015. Overview of tomato value chain in Ghana. Available at https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwjG_fnducLhAhVOqaQKHc26AXcQFjAAegQIBBAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.syngentafoundation.org%2Ffile%2F1336%2Fdownload%3Ftoken%3DqCp6GkVV&usg=AOvVaw20-35s1ev7MngLS5iMPWq1 (Accessed 9 April 2019).
  • Montuori P, Triassi M & Sarnacchiaro P, 2012. The consumption of genetically modified foods in Italian high school students. Food Quality and Preference 26(2): 246–51.
  • Moon W & Balasubramanian S K., 2004. Public attitudes toward agrobiotechnology: The mediating role of risk perceptions on the impact of trust, awareness, and outrage. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 186-208.
  • Oparinde A, Abdoulaye T, Mignouna DB & Bamire AS, 2017. Will farmers intend to cultivate provitamin A genetically modified (GM) cassava in Nigeria? Evidence from a k-means segmentation analysis of beliefs and attitudes. PloS One 12(7): e0179427.
  • Owusu Coffie R, Burton MP, Gibson FL & Hailu A, 2016. Choice of rice production practices in Ghana: A comparison of willingness to pay and preference space estimates. Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(3): 799–819.
  • Quaye W, Yawson I, Yawson RM & Williams IE, 2009. Acceptance of biotechnology and socialcultural implications in Ghana. African Journal of Biotechnology 8(9): 1997–2003.
  • Revelt D & Train K, 1998. Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80(4): 647–57.
  • Scarpa R, Thiene M & Train K, 2008. Utility in willingness to pay space: A tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90: 994–1010.
  • Train KE, 2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yiridoe EK, Bonti-Ankomah S & Martin RC, 2005. Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20(4): 193–205.